tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Nov 06 02:20:57 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: yuch

Regina Reusser ([email protected])



ngabwI':
> nuqjatlh? "If you do not egg..."
Qu'vatlh... "bIqImbe'chugh" jIlab vIneH...

> tetpu'bogh yuch vIlo' je, 'ach jIpo'Ha'....
'op ben, nItab jIyIntaHvIS, pIj jIvutchu', 'ej Soj chu' vI'ogh, 'ach DaH 'e'
vImev, meq vISovbe'.

> > yuch chIS, yuch qIj je tu'lu'.
>
> Don't you mean *lu*tu'lu'? (This is a *very* common mistake.)
jImIS... *TKD* 'ay' 4.2.5Daq {naDev puqpu' tu'lu'} vIlaD. vaj lugh'a' {naDev
puqpu' lutu'lu'}?

> wa' DoS wIqIpchu'. yuch vIchopDI', muchopnIS. }}: )
toH.. not qagh ngaSbogh yuch vISop (mon)

> Very close. The noun comes first: it's A Q law' B Q puS:
> yuch qIj HoSghaj law', yuch mIS HoSghaj puS. }}; )
jIyaj.

> yuch Seghvam DamuS'a'?
HIja'. yuch nap, qIj vImaS.

> > Dap vIghItlh 'e' vISov,
>
> Remember that {ghItlh} has little to do with writing. You just said you
made
> marks on nonsense. I would suggest using {gher} "to formulate" or even the
> more general {lab} "to send data away"
vaj Dap vIlab 'e' vISov ...



Senara







Back to archive top level