tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed May 26 20:18:29 2004
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: core semantic case roles: agent, patient, focus
- From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: core semantic case roles: agent, patient, focus
- Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 23:17:47 -0400
- References: <[email protected]>
From: <[email protected]>
> In a message dated 2004-05-26 2:23:05 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> [email protected] writes:
>
> > . There is no basis on which to claim that {-ta'} or {-lI'}
> > can only be used on action verbs.
> >
> >
>
> If he doesn't claim that, how does he use them? {-lI'} has NEVER been
used
> in an example, according to one recent post here.
> lay'tel SIvten
TKD gives two examples: {chollI'} "it is getting closer" and {vIlI'lI'} "I
am transmitting (the data)" (p. 42). I'm not aware of any other examples,
but I haven't got a complete database of canon.
Two examples in the very section that explains the suffix isn't much to go
on. The suffix *is* used by Klingons - otherwise there wouldn't be a
section describing it. It simply hasn't been used in any of the examples
*we've* seen.
jIDoy'lI'!
SuStel
Stardate 4402.8
P.S.: Here's a word I came up with once that's sure to send shivers down the
spines of some people: {yInenta'} "Grow up already!" (Yep, we now know that
should be {yInen'eghmoHta'}.