tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri May 21 16:59:17 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: paghHu'/paghleS

MorphemeAddict ([email protected])

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: paghHu'/paghleS
• Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 19:58:31 EDT

In a message dated 2004-05-21 11:00:24 AM Eastern Daylight Time, 
[email protected] writes:

> . Instead of fixating on the most obscure aspects of English
> and trying to find ways to say them in Klingon, why not just write things
> in Klingon, using the resources we all know and agree on?  

[snipped]
> 
> the challenge is to create something wonderful within strict limitations.
> I truly believe that a lot of these "what-ifs" and questionable
> derivations could be avoided if people simply tried to communicate in
> Klingon, using the resources we've already got.
> 
> -- ter'eS
> 
> 
Nothing in my suggestion for {paghHu'} was based on English.  It was an 
application of known Klingon grammar and vocabulary, the "resources we've already 
got".

lay'tel SIvten  

• Prev by Date: Re: paghHu'/paghleS
• Next by Date: to bed vs. to the bed
• Previous by thread: Re: paghHu'/paghleS
• Next by thread: Re: paghHu'/paghleS
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level