tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jun 29 17:35:48 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: -beH and -rup on qualities

QeS lagh ([email protected])

• From: "QeS lagh" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: -beH and -rup on qualities
• Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:50:15 +1000
• Bcc:

ghItlhpu' SuStel:

>I don't see any reason to deny putting {-beH} or {-rup} on quality verbs.
>Okrand never makes a case that you can only be ready to do an action and 
>not
>be a quality, and there's no logical reason that it can't work.

wa' DoS wIqIp. Dap bIHbe'law' je latlh Segh cha' mojaqmey:

quvHa'vIp - he is afraid of being dishonoured
ngoQmeywIj vIchavmeH jImaghnISbe' jIH - I don't need to be evil to achieve 
my goal
bIjaqqang - you are willing to be bold

vaj mojaqmeyvam DIvuSnISbe' 'e' vIHarqu'.

QeS lagh

_________________________________________________________________
Get a Virgin Credit Card and win an adventure:   
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;8661322;9498324;s?http://www.promo.com.au/virgincreditcard/firstbirthday/track.cfm?source=N92

• Prev by Date: Re: other lines from ST5
• Next by Date: tep
• Previous by thread: Re: other lines from ST5
• Next by thread: Hub'eghrupHa', DuQwI'Hommey on SP2
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level