tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Jun 11 15:05:31 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

lol (was Re: taH...)

MorphemeAddict ([email protected])

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: lol (was Re: taH...)
• Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 18:04:45 EDT

In a message dated 2004-06-11 10:40:37 AM Eastern Daylight Time, 
[email protected] writes:

> >SuvwI' lol ghaH} the warrior doesn't have to be the one in the stance.
> 
> True, but without any context the pronoun {ghaH} logically refers to the 
> person mentioned previously in the sentence: {SuvwI'}.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Voragh
> 

If {ghaH} referred to {SuvwI'}, it would be reflexive, and thus expressed in 
a totally different way: {lol'egh SuvwI'}.  qar'a'?  So what would {ghaH} 
refer back to?  Some word in a previous sentence.

lay'tel SIvten

• Prev by Date: Re: Klingon in "Daddy Day Care"?
• Next by Date: lol (was Re: taH...)
• Previous by thread: Re: Klingon in "Daddy Day Care"?
• Next by thread: lol (was Re: taH...)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level