tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Jun 06 21:25:11 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

why verbs with {-wI'} can't take prefixes (rehash)

MorphemeAddict ([email protected]) [KLI Member] [Hol taghwI']



Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 00:14:43 GMT
To: [email protected]
From: [email protected]
Subject: Re: agentive -wI'
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
/begin quote/
> FWIW, I see no cause to "kill" any debate, short of Dr. Okrand specifically 
> telling us what's what....

I do. My goal is to have people speaking the language, not just arguing over 
how many angels can dance on the head of a pin. I serve that goal best when I 
shut up and let charghwI' talk. I'm not proud of these outbursts, but I can't 
stand and watch an environment full of beginners taking in arguments about 
how 
prefixes should be used with verbs with {-wI'} when I'm quite certain they 
cannot, under any circumstances, ever be used. This is how we get a 
generation 
of people who can't speak the language well, babbling gibberish based on 
ideas 
that don't have any evidence behind them.

> -Sengval

Will
/end quote/

If we suppose that the prefix is added to the verb after all the suffixes are 
added, then as soon as {-wI'} is in place, the word has become a noun, and so 
of course it can't take a verbal prefix.

lay'tel SIvten






Back to archive top level