tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jan 06 13:47:20 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: time

Philip Newton ([email protected])

• From: Philip Newton <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: time
• Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 20:53:18 +0100
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
• Organization: very little
• References: <[email protected]> with last message <007b01c3d48b$464e8700$6500a8c0@c1199768b> <[email protected]>

On (No, or invalid, date.), "Regina Reusser"
<[email protected]> wrote:

> > We have the verb {poH}and the noun {poH}.  I don't think we've
> > seen the verb in canon (though I'm sure to be corrected if I'm
> > mistaken).
>
> ... wot "poH" vISovbe' jIH...

wot DIp je ngaS TKD.

Philip

• References:
  • time
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: time
    • From: "d'Armond Speers, Ph.D." <[email protected]>
  • Re: Resources
    • From: "Regina Reusser" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Qapbe'chu' De'wI'wIj
• Next by Date: Re: time
• Prev by thread: Re: Qapbe'chu' De'wI'wIj
• Next by thread: Re: Qapbe'chu' De'wI'wIj
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level