tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Jan 01 12:32:51 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: KLBC boghmo' 'IHrIStoS malop

Alan Anderson ([email protected])

• From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: KLBC boghmo' 'IHrIStoS malop
• Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 13:38:32 -0500
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]>

ja' Scott Willis:
>Yes, even with reflexive objects. As you pointed out, you didn't give each
>other, you gave *presents* *to* each other. "Each other" is the *in*direct
>object of the verb.

ja' Philip:
>But "each other", not "us", is the indirect object of the verb in
>English, so I wasn't sure whether "to each other" could be translated
>with {maHvaD} here.

If you want to make the intent more obvious, you can be more explicit.

  latlhvaD jInob 'ej jIHvaD nob latlh

-- ghunchu'wI'

• References:
  • Re: KLBC boghmo' 'IHrIStoS malop
    • From: Philip Newton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Resources
• Next by Date: DIS chu'
• Prev by thread: Re: KLBC boghmo' 'IHrIStoS malop
• Next by thread: Re: KLBC boghmo' 'IHrIStoS malop
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level