tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Aug 25 07:26:02 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: waH

Steven Boozer ([email protected])

• From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: waH
• Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 09:25:54 -0500
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>

Bryan S. Jones you wrote:

>[[GMAIL]] vIwaH.
>If you are not me, disregard this message.

jIHbe'chugh SoH, QInvam yIbuSHa'.

Hmm... just playing with pronouns-as-verbs.  Have we ever seen a Type 9 
suffix on a pronoun?



-- 
Voragh
Ca'Non Master of the Klingons 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: waH
    • From: Philip Newton <[email protected]>

• References:
  • waH
    • From: Bryan Jones <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Klingon WOTD: qempeq (n)
• Next by Date: RE: Klingon WOTD: qempeq (n)
• Previous by thread: waH
• Next by thread: Re: waH
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level