tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Aug 11 07:22:33 2004
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: puvlI'bogh (was Re: nughI')
Quvar:
> >Next question the comes to my mind: is that verb a transitive one? In
> >German one can "fly an airplane"...
QeS lagh:
>No, I don't think {puv} is transitive (at least on the evidence we have). We
>have the separate verb {'or} for "to fly (a craft)", and {puvmoH} would
>probably be as close as you could get with the root {puv}: {Duj vIpuvmoH} "I
>cause the ship to fly".
Now that we know of the verb {'or}, this *might* be understood as "launch
the ship" or even "get the ship ready to fly" (e.g. said by an engineer or
mechanic). Not that it's wrong to use {puv} "fly} when speaking of
{Dujmey}. Here's our only example of {puv} in canon:
puvtaHbogh Duj ngabmoHlaw' So'wI'
[cloaking device] allowing the ship to fly in a state of practical
invisibility. S33
{puvtaHbogh Duj} "a (continuously) flying ship", implying {puv Duj} "the
ship flies" (intransitive).
Just for review, Okrand on {'or}:
Maltz thought that the best word for "operate (an aircraft)" was {'or}
- so the person who does this would be the {'orwI'}, "one who operates
(an aircraft)". In general, {'or} would not be used to refer to the
activities of the captain of a spacecraft, or even those of its helmsman,
but Maltz said it could be used for the controlling of a shuttlecraft.
He was comfortable translating {'or} as "pilot" (the verb) and {'orwI'}
as "pilot" (the noun). [HQ 11.2]
And finally, we also have another word to refer to the physical act of
piloting (i.e. pushing buttons, manipulating a joystick, etc.):
By extension, the term {raQ} is also used when referring to controlling
a space vessel "manually" (that is, when the controls are manipulated
directly by a person rather than a computer): {Duj raQ} ("He/she controls
the ship manually"). [KGT 79]
--
Voragh
Ca'Non Master of the Klingons