tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Sep 03 10:39:25 2003

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Missing lines from ST5 [was Re: Klingon WOTD: poSmoH (v)]

Michael E Roney ([email protected])

• From: Michael E Roney <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Missing lines from ST5 [was Re: Klingon WOTD: poSmoH (v)]
• Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 10:37:22 -0500

[Korrd: DungDaq legh 'ej QotnIStaH romuluSngan be'pu'
          Romulan women belong on their backs!]
          (Hmm... Should this be {DubDaq}??  [Voragh])

I don't think so, I like the way it's phrased there.
I translated it something like:

Romulan women need to recline continuously and see the area overhead;
or in other words, like the translation says, be on their backs.

It strikes me as a very clever translation.

~naHQun
http://www.angelfire.com/tx4/purpleelaphants/languages/tlhInganHol.html

________________________________________________________________
The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Missing lines from ST5
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Klingon WOTD: taymoH (v)
• Next by Date: Re: Missing lines from ST5
• Prev by thread: Re: Missing lines from ST5
• Next by thread: Re: Missing lines from ST5
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level