tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Oct 23 17:56:29 2003

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: (KLBC) Is this right?

DloraH ([email protected])

• From: "DloraH" <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: (KLBC) Is this right?
• Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 18:31:02 -0400
• Importance: Normal
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

> > > Yeah, but in this case, {-taH} seems appropriate, since
> > > patience is usually a continuous thing.
>
> > {tuvtaHghach} works very well because of the nature of
> > being patient: it's something you do over time.
>
> I like it because someone
> who isn't *continuously* patient simply isn't patient.

With this explanation, we would never see tuv by itself; we would always see
tuvtaH.


DloraH

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: (KLBC) Is this right?
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: (KLBC) Is this right?
    • From: "Scott Willis" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Tao Te Ching Chp. 81
• Next by Date: Klingon WOTD: Sorya' (n)
• Prev by thread: Re: (KLBC) Is this right?
• Next by thread: RE: (KLBC) Is this right?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level