tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue May 20 10:52:55 2003

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

time context still not indicated

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: time context still not indicated
• Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 11:48:39 EDT

Sangqar wrote:

> tetlhvam vImuvDI', tlhIngan Hol mu'ghom vIlaDpu'
> When I joined this list, I had (already) read TKD
> 
> or future:  when i join this list, I will have read TKD.  this particular 
additional phrase does not specify a time either.  using a time adverbial like 
"wa'Hu'" ("yesterday") would fix the time in the past, as your next example 
fixes it in the future.

lay'tel SIvten

• Prev by Date: Re: tlhobqa'qu' taghwI'
• Next by Date: RE: Chicago qepHom
• Prev by thread: Re: Klingon WOTD: qIbHeS (n)
• Next by thread: Re: time context still not indicated
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level