tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Sep 19 02:43:40 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: TKW p. 186

• From: Quvar valer <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: TKW p. 186
• Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 03:26:49 -0400
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

ghItlh Voragh:

>Think of this as being akin to the far more widespread use of {tu'lu'} for 
>{lutu'lu'} with plural subjects in Klingon.  Cp. the virtual disappearance 
you mean with plural "objects".

>of "whom", the growing misuse of the subjunctive, etc., etc. in (American)
I understand.
This sounds like "it's not correct, but you can do it".

>English.  I'm sure there are similar "errors" in German among the post-War 
Oh, yes, there are many...

Quvar
  ghojwI'pu'lI' tISaH.

• References:
  • Re: TKW p. 186
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: HolQeD laDmeH (was RE: Maldives)
• Next by Date: Klingon WOTD: Ho' (n)
• Prev by thread: Re: TKW p. 186
• Next by thread: Re: TKW p. 186
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level