tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Sep 02 06:37:21 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: nuq 'oH KLBC'e'? (was: RE: EK: tayqeq wej)

• From: Stephan Schneider <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: nuq 'oH KLBC'e'? (was: RE: EK: tayqeq wej)
• Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 16:02:58 +0200
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]>

>  > >"KLBC"vaD yIghItlhtaH! Hoch tlhIngan QIn yIlaDtaH! ghoyu'! jIDub'eghbej.
>>
>>  nuq 'oH KLBC'e'? maH'a' KLBC?
>
>http://higbee.cots.net/~holtej/klingon/faq.htm#2.4
>
>
>>  Hoch tlhIngan QIn vIlaD vInID.
>
>Pronoun 'e'.
>... vIlaD 'e' vInID.
>
>
>>  loQ jIyaj, mu'ghom vIlaDbe'taHvIS. 'ej
>>  vIDub'egh vItul.
>
>vI-  "I [to] it", but you have -'egh on there.  -'egh requires a no-object
>prefix.
>jIDub'egh
>
>Again, pronoun 'e'.
>jIDub'egh 'e' vItul.

is /neH/ the only verb that doesn't need /'e'/?

vIyaj vIneH.

tulwI',
sts.

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: nuq 'oH KLBC'e'? (was: RE: EK: tayqeq wej)
    • From: "DloraH" <[email protected]>
  • Re: nuq 'oH KLBC'e'? (was: RE: EK: tayqeq wej)
    • From: Quvar valer <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: HeghmeH QaQbogh jaj yIngu'
• Next by Date: Re: tlhIngan Hol lujatlhbogh puq'e'
• Prev by thread: Re: Sayu'nIS
• Next by thread: RE: nuq 'oH KLBC'e'? (was: RE: EK: tayqeq wej)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level