tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Sep 02 06:37:21 2002
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: nuq 'oH KLBC'e'? (was: RE: EK: tayqeq wej)
- From: Stephan Schneider <sts@stephan-schneider.net>
- Subject: Re: nuq 'oH KLBC'e'? (was: RE: EK: tayqeq wej)
- Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 16:02:58 +0200
- In-Reply-To: <LPBBIGKDIBNNFFIEJIPFMEDDCMAA.DloraH@kli.org>
- References: <LPBBIGKDIBNNFFIEJIPFMEDDCMAA.DloraH@kli.org>
> > >"KLBC"vaD yIghItlhtaH! Hoch tlhIngan QIn yIlaDtaH! ghoyu'! jIDub'eghbej.
>>
>> nuq 'oH KLBC'e'? maH'a' KLBC?
>
>http://higbee.cots.net/~holtej/klingon/faq.htm#2.4
>
>
>> Hoch tlhIngan QIn vIlaD vInID.
>
>Pronoun 'e'.
>... vIlaD 'e' vInID.
>
>
>> loQ jIyaj, mu'ghom vIlaDbe'taHvIS. 'ej
>> vIDub'egh vItul.
>
>vI- "I [to] it", but you have -'egh on there. -'egh requires a no-object
>prefix.
>jIDub'egh
>
>Again, pronoun 'e'.
>jIDub'egh 'e' vItul.
is /neH/ the only verb that doesn't need /'e'/?
vIyaj vIneH.
tulwI',
sts.