tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Oct 15 09:12:07 2002
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: Two quick questions
- From: "Sangqar (Sean Healy)" <sangqar@hotmail.com>
- Subject: Re: KLBC: Two quick questions
- Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 14:12:19 +0000
Since nobody else has answered this, I'll take a stab at it.
>The second question was from Brent Kesler's article on -be' and -Ha'. At
>one point he says:
>
>jIQuchbe' 'ach qarbe' 'e' jIQuchHa'
>
>When I read this I can't get it to make sense. I assume he is saying "I
>am not happy but I'm unhappy is not correct", looking at the context of
>the sentence. But jI- can't take an object and that's what 'e' is,
>should qarbe' and jIQuchHa' be the other way around or have I missed
>something again?
I suspect it is a mistyping of:
jIQuchbe' 'ach qarbe' 'ej jIQuchHa'be'.
If the author is on this list, perhaps he can say for sure.
In the next paragraph he glosses Qochbe' as 'not agree', when it should be
'not disagree'. He probably meant QochHa'be'. (Just in case anyone was
confused by this QaghHom.)
>qurgh
Sangqar
_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com