tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri May 17 05:38:01 2002
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: [KLBC] SISpu'
- From: Captain Krankor <krankor@yay.tim.org>
- Subject: Re: [KLBC] SISpu'
- Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 05:37:57 -0400
> This thread has gotten confusing enough that I feel compelled to make one thing
> very clear for all beginners:
>
> Locatives are not subjects or objects. They are locatives. When you put {-Daq}
> on a noun, it has to go somewhere before the place the direct object would go
> in the sentence. It's that simple.
(much deleted)
Will, will you stop confusing my beginners! Sheesh! I was just making
a point about sentence order, and you turn it into a profound discussion
of deep meaning of type 5 noun suffixes! All I was trying to point out
was that he had put the locative in the subject position! He hadn't
misunderstood locatives, he misunderstood sentence order! Leave the
BG-ing to the BG please!!!!
> You can translate {HoDpu''e' pup Qanqor} several ways:
No you can't, it's a nonsense sentence! Or, to be more accurate, it's
a controversial sentences with is ENTIRELY INAPPROPRIATE for beginners!
I've never seen -'e' used that way in my life, and I would assert
that there is no sensible translation of that sentence. I would certainly
agree that we could have a *very* interesting discussion about it,
among old hands. In fact, I'm sure we will. But my point is, that
this does NOT clarify anything for a beginner, which was your original
intention stated at the top of the post!