tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat May 04 17:09:28 2002
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Servers
- From: Alan Anderson <aranders@netusa1.net>
- Subject: Servers
- Date: Sat, 4 May 2002 16:09:41 -0500
- In-Reply-To: <OE41ijb1u2ZN9KAy4Mo0000047d@hotmail.com>
- References: <F76yCF1HkikieqXItMc00000657@hotmail.com><OE41ijb1u2ZN9KAy4Mo0000047d@hotmail.com>
ja' SuStel:
>In this case, there has been no real "convention" for the translation of the
>word "server," relating to computers.
There have been several translations of the term, but none of them stands
out as appropriate. Early on, I remember seing {HablI'} "data transceiving
device" used for many different things, from modems to computer file
servers. The semi-obvious {toy'wI'} doesn't work for me, since it implies
a subordinate relationship to a {pIn}. A slightly skewed {jabwI'} comes
closer, but it seems that {tebwI'} "filler" would be closer to the right
idea.
Actually, given the apparent derivation of the word, I'd guess that a
Klingon computer server would just be a {De'wI'}. A file server would be a
{qawHaq De'wI'}, a print server would be a {ghItlhmeH De'wI'}, a database
server would be a {ta De'wI'}, etc.
-- ghunchu'wI'
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Servers
- From: "David Trimboli" <SuStel@hotmail.com>