tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Mar 25 21:30:21 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: KLBC: {-be'}

>> ...And we know from canon that
>> some ungrammatical constructions are acceptable in some circumstances.
>> (TKD, p. 168)

ja' Will:
>Ummm, page 168 is the list of verb suffixes and special number suffixes. I
>don't see that as in any way relating to your argument. If I'm wrong about
>this, it would be helpful if you'd point out the specific thing you are
>referring to.

The page number is correct.  The book, however, is KGT, not TKD.  That's
the beginning of the section on acceptable ungrammaticality.

-- ghunchu'wI'

Back to archive top level