tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Mar 25 21:30:21 2002
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: {-be'}
>> ...And we know from canon that
>> some ungrammatical constructions are acceptable in some circumstances.
>> (TKD, p. 168)
ja' Will:
>Ummm, page 168 is the list of verb suffixes and special number suffixes. I
>don't see that as in any way relating to your argument. If I'm wrong about
>this, it would be helpful if you'd point out the specific thing you are
>referring to.
The page number is correct. The book, however, is KGT, not TKD. That's
the beginning of the section on acceptable ungrammaticality.
-- ghunchu'wI'