tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Mar 02 16:30:19 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: inaccurate but never approximate (was RE: yaywIj yIngaq!)

• From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: inaccurate but never approximate (was RE: yaywIj yIngaq!)
• Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2002 16:21:49 -0500
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]><[email protected]>

ja'pu' 'ISqu':
>Didn't Okrand list (in "Power Klingon") *accuracy* as one of the four main
>ideals of "acceptable Klingon conduct", which can be conveyed though
>language?

ja' SuStel:
>Yes, but he then goes on the describe precision, not accuracy.

tlhaQqu'.  In his description, he hits the target perfectly.  It's just not
the target he said it was. :-)

-- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh

• References:
  • inaccurate but never approximate (was RE: yaywIj yIngaq!)
    • From: "Agnieszka Solska" <[email protected]>
  • Re: inaccurate but never approximate (was RE: yaywIj yIngaq!)
    • From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: "mourn" (was Re: Heghpu' SuvwI')
• Next by Date: Re: lu- (was Re: [KLBC] -lu' and -ghach)
• Prev by thread: Re: inaccurate but never approximate (was RE: yaywIj yIngaq!)
• Next by thread: Klingon WOTD: choQ (n)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level