tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jun 11 09:03:01 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: words for edit image

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: RE: words for edit image
• Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 09:02:49 -0400 (EDT)
• In-Reply-To: <001901c21114$bc4805d0$40b11cd3@homepeter>
• References: <001901c21114$bc4805d0$40b11cd3@homepeter>
• User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.6

> If the term, nagh beQ is a term that bas been extended to mean the
> resulting artwork itself, then a copy either a photo or a drawing is a
> representation of that artwork. So could not the representation of the
> artwork also mean nagh beQ?

It could.  We don't know.  Okrand hasn't reveled much in this area.


DloraH, BG

• References:
  • RE: words for edit image
    • From: "SIqar" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Question about MO
• Next by Date: Re: jajwIj nI'
• Prev by thread: RE: words for edit image
• Next by thread: Re: jajwIj nI'
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level