tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Jul 25 06:22:29 2002
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
'Iqqu'
- From: "Agnieszka Solska" <[email protected]>
- Subject: 'Iqqu'
- Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 11:20:52 +0000
'Iqqu'
nuqawmoHmeH lab Voragh:
: "To express the idea of 'too much gagh' or 'too many
:tribbles,' the verb {'Iq} 'be too many, be too much'
:is :used adjectivally. For example: {yIHmey 'Iq vIlegh}
:'I see too many tribbles'. {qagh 'Iq vISop} 'I eat
:too much gagh'. Sometimes, the word {law'qu'} 'be very many'
:(formed from {law'} 'be many' plus {qu'}, the emphatic suffix)
:is translated 'be too many.' If the context is clear, this
:is acceptable, but if it important to stress the idea of
:'overly many, overly much, more than there ought to be,'
:{tlhoy} or {'Iq} is usually employed."
muSIvmoH De'vam:
tay'laHbej wot {law'} mojaq {-qu'} je.
'ach tay'laH'a' wot {'Iq} mojaq {-qu'} je?
DuH'a' mu'tlheghmeyvam?
Using {-qu'} on {law'} seems logical. Using {-qu'} to further emphacize
{'Iq} seems excessive {{:-), but don't you think it might sometimes work?
What's your view of the following:
1a/ SoHmo' 'Iq SengwIj.
[You cause me too much trouble.]
1b/ SoHmo' 'Iqqu' SengwIj.
[You cause me far too much trouble.]
[You do cause me far too much trouble.]
1c/ SoHmo' 'Iqqu'bej SengwIj.
[You certainly do cause me far too much trouble.]
2a/ naDev nov 'Iq (lu)tu'lu'.
[There are too many outsiders here.]
2b/ naDev nov 'Iq (lu)tu'lu'bej.
[There are certainly too many outsiders here.]
2a/ naDev nov 'Iqqu' (lu)tu'lu'bej.
[There are certainly far too many outsiders here.]
'ISqu'
_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com