tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Jan 31 11:40:28 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: KLBC: Klingon distress call (updated)

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: KLBC: Klingon distress call (updated)
• Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 11:40:27 -0500 (EST)
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]>
• User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.6

> > maH nuHIvtaH jagh. maHegh 'ach DIrIQ. pechol 'ej DaHIv. bortaS chenobHa'.
> 
> On reflection, I probably should have used some imperative prefixes. . .
> 
> maH nuHIvtaH jagh. maHegh 'ach DIrIQ. HIchol 'ej tIHIv! bortaS ghonobHa'!

maj. 'ach cha' mu' vIchoH.

Just so others may be aware, you chose rIQ - injured.  
We also have QIH - Damage; and QID - wound.

rIQ is intransitive, so this would need -moH.  'ach DIrIQmoH.

QIH might be more appropriate if refering to ships.


>bortaS ghonobHa'

This implies that they will be taking back what they presumably have given.  
And this brings up the question, what do we do with revenge?  Do we tlhap, baj, 
jon, ta', chav, nob, jab, etc.?


DloraH, BG

• References:
  • KLBC: Klingon distress call (updated)
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: RE: Qongbogh targhmey
• Next by Date: Re: KLBC Re: peD
• Prev by thread: KLBC: Klingon distress call (updated)
• Next by thread: Re: KLBC: Klingon distress call (updated)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level