tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jan 29 11:38:42 2002
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Aryeh ben Naphtali wrote:
> Cardassiano@aol.com <Cardassiano@aol.com> wrote:
> >It sounds like that Klingon writing system may be more like that of Terran
> >languages such as Chinese or Japanese using pictograms rather than actual
> >letters. Or it could even be hirogliphs as in ancient Egyptian.
> I vote for syllabary (like Sumerian, Akkadian, early Ugaritic and
> Phoenician, modern Amkharic, Japanese Kana). It better suits the language...
The problem with a syllabary is that if you don't have restrictions
on the number of consonants and vowels, or the formations of, it gets
a bit complicated, and you have many, many characters (for lack of a
better term) to remember. I see Klingon as just complicated enough
that your syllabary would be fairly large. It doesn't following the
(C)V or C (only the "nh" sound) form of Japanese (not familiar with
the rest), which keeps the Japanese syllabary a reasonable size (46,
However, since most words are of the form CVC, with CV- prefixes and
-CVC suffixes, and just a few CVCC words (with great restriction), I
can see something like Arabic -- alphabetic, but with some simplication.
Picture more elaborate characters for C but less for V. Most words
would be CC with a small indication of V, which could be left out if
you're in a hurry, or it's "obvious".
I might also suggest that the "rgh", "y'" and "w'" clusters might
have their own characters. Of course, it's all mere speculation. :-)
|| Russ Perry Jr 2175 S Tonne Dr #114 Arlington Hts IL 60005 ||
|| 847-952-9729 email@example.com VIDEOGAME COLLECTOR! ||
- Re: Alphabet
- From: "Aryeh ben Naphtali" <firstname.lastname@example.org>