tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jan 29 09:23:08 2002
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Klingon alphabet -pIqaD
From: "Qov" <email@example.com>
> lab SuStel
> > From: "qurgh lungqIj" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > > Although, are writing systems covered by linguistics, > > or is the
> > > not that wide? HolQeD'e' pagh vISov.
> > Dunqu' mu'tlheghvam!!
> Do'Ha' pabbe' mu'tlheghvetlh.
bIlughbe'. pabbejqu' mu'tlhegh.
> DIp DIp lo'lu'DI', DIp wa'DIchDaq mojaq
> vaghDIch lanlu' net tuch. mojaq vaghDIch 'oH <-'e'>'e'.
DIp DIp lo'be'pu'.
This wasn't a noun-noun construction. He used /HolQeD'e'/ as a noun in a
header position, and /pagh/ in the object position.
The topic of the sentence is /HolQeD/. Regarding /HolQeD/, he knows
This is no different grammatically than something like
DujDaq pagh vIlegh.
You'll agree there's no noun-noun there. The structure is
Header-Object-Verb, as it is with his sentence.
And yes, we can use topicalized nouns like this. The canon example is
qIbDaq SuvwI''e' SoH Dun law' Hoch Dun puS.
You would be the greatest warrior in the galaxy. (Star Trek V)
Literally: "In the galaxy, topic: warrior, you are the most wonderful."