tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Jan 25 18:52:22 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: Klingon dialects

• From: "TPO" <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: Klingon dialects
• Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 18:52:18 -0500
• Importance: Normal
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

> True, but how much has "Enterprise" followed what has
> been already stated in the past 30 years of Star Trek.
>  & I'm talking canon, not non-canon.  "Enterprise" has
> gone so way off track its pathetic,

jIQochbe', 'ach wa' Hogh ret  DuH vItlhoj.  chaq qaSpa' Soch DIS  qun mojHa'
poHvam  qaSmoH wanI' taQ.  qar qun chu'.  qun choHmoHbogh noH'e' yIqaw.

I agree, but last week I realized a possibility.  Perhaps sometime over the
next seven years an anomaly will change this time line.  The new history
will be accurate.  Remember the "temporal cold war".


DloraH

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Klingon dialects
    • From: "T. J. Harrington" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: Klingon dialects
    • From: "T. J. Harrington" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: Klingon dialects
• Next by Date: RE: KLBC: T'Anna
• Prev by thread: Re: Klingon dialects
• Next by thread: RE: Klingon dialects
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level