tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Jan 17 19:08:32 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: A couple of questions.



As I originally suggested maybe [nItlh rarwI'] would work

Although I do like the logic of nItlh qIv.. The elbow and knee are
comparable joints but feel that logic would see the use of qIvHom as in
nItlh qIvHom working for lesser/small joints like knuckles

qe'San
----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>


> Or just as likely the Klingon word (or words) for "knuckle"
>has nothing to do with <qIv>. In any case, I don't think <-'a'>
> and <-Hom> can be stretched this far and still make sense.
>
> pagh



Back to archive top level