tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Feb 05 09:26:53 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: KLBC: lu- with -lu'

• From: "TPO" <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: KLBC: lu- with -lu'
• Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 09:26:52 -0500
• Importance: Normal
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

> {chay' mu'meyvam lo'lu'?} ... {chay' mu'meyvam lulo'lu'?}.  
> {naDev puqpu' tu'lu'} 
> Why isn't it {naDev puqpu' lutu'lu'}?

Because he goofed.  You are right, it should be with lu-.
For more information about the mis-use of lu- read KGT starting on p168.

DloraH, BG

• References:
  • KLBC: lu- with -lu'
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: RE: ghubDaQ
• Next by Date: RE: KLBC T'Anna (was: RE: Puns in new vocab, Da'vI' Da'nal je
• Prev by thread: KLBC: lu- with -lu'
• Next by thread: Hotmail lo'wI'pu'
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level