tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Feb 04 23:47:09 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Alphabet

In a message dated 2/3/2002 8:18:55 PM Mountain Standard Time, writes:

> Actually, I didn't take those into account, but are you sure that {ow} is 
> not valid?  I mean, is there an Okrandian source?  Finnish has that 
> particular diphthong, although it is admittedly hard for beginners to 
> distinguish from a long o.  Since Klingon doesn't have a long o, it seems 
> that paricular difficulty wouldn't exist.

I'm quoting only an Okrand source, TKD, p. 17, top.


Back to archive top level