tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Feb 04 23:47:09 2002
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Alphabet
- From: PeHruS9@aol.com
- Subject: Re: Alphabet
- Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 23:47:02 EST
In a message dated 2/3/2002 8:18:55 PM Mountain Standard Time,
sangqar@hotmail.com writes:
> Actually, I didn't take those into account, but are you sure that {ow} is
> not valid? I mean, is there an Okrandian source? Finnish has that
> particular diphthong, although it is admittedly hard for beginners to
> distinguish from a long o. Since Klingon doesn't have a long o, it seems
> that paricular difficulty wouldn't exist.
>
>
I'm quoting only an Okrand source, TKD, p. 17, top.
peHruS