tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Feb 01 18:46:00 2002
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: peD
In a message dated 1/31/2002 8:55:44 AM Mountain Standard Time,
[email protected] writes:
> chal wep lurur 'engmey'e'. qaStaHvIS ram, Dachchugh 'eng, bIrchoHlaH muD.
> SaHchugh 'engmey, loQ bIrchoHghach bot. muD tujchoHmoHlaH pemHov neH, 'ach
> muD
> bIrchoHghach mevlaH 'engmey.
>
Daj ghItlhvam. Dotlh Delchu'. Dun mu'mey Dalo'bogh. vIlaDmeH, ngeD
ghItlhlIj.
Dun tlhIngan Hol, qar'a'?
peHruS
PS: You're so right that MO has "violated" his own rule prohibiting a type 7
verb suffix after the pronoun 'e' (at least in SAO construction).
So, does this bring us to consider that the language is "undergoing
evolution"? If MO uses the language this way, should we not follow suit?