tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Aug 26 06:11:57 2002
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: tlhIngan Hol lujatlhbogh puq'e'
> > neither do i think that "DaHjaj" in the sentence /rIn DaHjaj/ is a
>> time-stamp. it's just a noun. the subject isn't marked, as usual. i
>> say that /wa'leS/ in /wa'leS rIn DaHjaj/ isn't marked, although it is
>> a time-stamp.
>-Daq and -'e' can be in the header or in the body, and some locatives
>(naDev) don't have -Daq, and time-stamps don't have any added affixes... The
>rule that determines what word is what is it's location because klingon has
>strict word placement.
yes, i forgot that something similar occurs also with locative nouns
like /naDev/ (i remember that this, long time ago, was part of this
but there's just no problem. /naDev/ is a locative noun by nature. that's all.
>Instead of creating some rule to explain what the case is of a particular
>word, you just look at it's placement.
this is absolutely sufficient in order to understand what's a
subject, object or header. but, for example, in order to understand
the difference between the header nouns /batlh/, /naDev/, /DaHjaj/
you have to say "cases", or "X".