tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Aug 16 17:20:37 2002
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Aw: Re: Aw: Re: Aw: RE: adverbials
lab HomDoq:
>jatlh tulwI':
>> > > err... no!!! i can't believe it!
>> > >
>vIjang, vIjatlh:
>> >tough
>>
>mujang tulwI', ghel:
>> what means "tough"?
>>
>ghu'vam Dellu'chugh,
><<Do'Ha'>> Dalo'laH
>"tough" DamughmoH.
toH. DaH vISuv. qatlho'.
> > >this is like saying "a tool can be used as a saw, but only a few"
> > >you're giving a rule which isn't true for the bigger part of the
>> >set you're trying to apply it to.
>>
>> hm. but the rule is correct, isn't it?
>>
>chaq loQ lugh :=), 'ach lo'laHqu'be'chu'.
hm. a bit. at least.
> > i thought you expert klingons can see that immediately. :)
>>
>po'wI' jIHbe' 'ej ghe'naQDaq vIDabe' je...
>:)
what does it mean not to live in an opera?
i don't know. it seems to me as if there is always a better, more
correct and stuff explanation for what i would like to interpret in
the klingon grammar. i had many difficulty in reading tkd (in
german), and now i would like to revenge inventing simplier rules. {;)
tulwI',
sts.