tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Aug 15 16:17:20 2002
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re:
>From "sydneygb" <[email protected]>
>Sender: [email protected]
>From: "sydneygb" <[email protected]>
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re:Re:QIt
>X-Mailer: WebMAIL to Mail Gateway v2.0q
>Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 08:01:06 -0500
>Message-id: <[email protected]>
>
>>> >vaj jIloS. 'ej jIloS. nI' poH jIloStaH. tagha'
>mavIHqa'.
>>>
>>> don't we have to say /poH nI' jIloStaH/?
>
>>Actually, you have to say /qaStaHvIS poH nI' jIloStaH/. We
>have >no evidence that durations can stand on their own as
>noun
>>phrases, though we do have evidence that they are expressed
>as >subordinate clauses.
>
>pIch vIghajqa'. HIvqa' veqlargh. qaStaHvIS poH nI' (DaH
>mu'meyvetlh vIqawqa'nIS) tlhIngan Hol vIjatlhlaHbe', 'ej pab
>po' vIghombe'. vaj 'argh pabwIj. jIDub 'e' vIHech!
>jupwI'pu' DIghIj wIneHchugh SuStel jIH je, po'nISbej
>tlhIngan Hol vIjatlhDI'!
qaQaH vInID. :)
i'm not sure but i found these mistakes (please verify):
/pab po'/ -> /pabpo'/
/'argh pabwIj/ -> /'argh'egh pabwIj/ pagh /pabwIj 'arghlu'/
/jIDub/ -> /jIDub'egh/
>tulughmoHtaHneS. jIqeqnISqu'ba'!
>
>jIqel
:)
tulwI',
sts.