Re:

[Stephan Schneider <sts@stephan-schneider.net>]

>From "sydneygb" <sydneygb@fast.net>
>Sender: sydneygb@fast.net
>From: "sydneygb" <sydneygb@fast.net>
>To: tlhIngan-Hol@kli.org
>Subject: Re:Re:QIt
>X-Mailer: WebMAIL to Mail Gateway v2.0q
>Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 08:01:06 -0500
>Message-id: <3d5ba612.7b6b.269167349@fast.net>
>
>>>  >vaj jIloS.  'ej jIloS.  nI' poH jIloStaH.  tagha'
>mavIHqa'.
>>>
>>>  don't we have to say /poH nI' jIloStaH/?
>
>>Actually, you have to say /qaStaHvIS poH nI' jIloStaH/.  We
>have >no evidence that durations can stand on their own as
>noun
>>phrases, though we do have evidence that they are expressed
>as  >subordinate clauses.
>
>pIch vIghajqa'.  HIvqa' veqlargh.  qaStaHvIS poH nI' (DaH
>mu'meyvetlh vIqawqa'nIS) tlhIngan Hol vIjatlhlaHbe', 'ej pab
>po' vIghombe'.  vaj 'argh pabwIj.  jIDub 'e' vIHech!
>jupwI'pu' DIghIj wIneHchugh SuStel jIH je, po'nISbej
>tlhIngan Hol vIjatlhDI'!

qaQaH vInID. :)

i'm not sure but i found these mistakes (please verify):
/pab po'/ -> /pabpo'/
/'argh pabwIj/ -> /'argh'egh pabwIj/ pagh /pabwIj 'arghlu'/
/jIDub/ -> /jIDub'egh/

>tulughmoHtaHneS.  jIqeqnISqu'ba'!
>
>jIqel

:)

tulwI',
sts.