tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Oct 22 00:26:57 2001
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: QamvIS Hegh, torvIS yIn
- From: "Rohan Fenwick" <[email protected]>
- Subject: RE: QamvIS Hegh, torvIS yIn
- Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 05:07:06
ja' charghwI':
>In addition to SuStel's excellent response to this, it should be pointed
>out
>that Okrand explicitly describes the comparative law'/puS construction as
>unrelated to any other Klingon grammatical construction. You can't just
>ignore that and interpret law'/puS as if it related to other grammar.
DaH vIyaj.
pab motlh 'oH 'e' vIHarpu'. 'ach pab pIm 'e' vIlIj. lugh DloraH: mu'ghom
vIlaDpu'. DaH mu'ghom vIlaDnISqa'.
Qapla' 'ej Satlho'
ro'Han
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp