tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Jan 22 10:07:07 2001
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
(KLBC) subordinate clauses
- From: Nicolau Rodrigues <[email protected]>
- Subject: (KLBC) subordinate clauses
- Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 13:05:57 -0500
I'm sure that this question has been stated before, but from what I've seen in the archives I don't know still if I'm right or not. The matter is: can subordinate clauses introduced by a Type 9 verbal suffix have in its turn a dependent clause? I mean, do these sentences make sense?
1- jIpaS vIneHbe'mo' juH vIchegh
1a- I go home because I don't want to be late
2- jIQoch 'e' vIQIjmo' QeHchoH
2a- He got angry because I explained that I disagree
In my opinon, they do. But I haven't found any example of this use in canon.
--ghaHbe'wI'
_________________________________________________________
http://www.latinmail.com. Gratuito, latino y en espaņol.