tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Jan 17 15:04:00 2001
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: body parts?
- From: Marc Ruehlaender <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: body parts?
- Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 17:03:42 CST
I asked
> : The question has come up whether things like {'aD}, {Somraw}, etc.
> : etc. are body parts in the sense that they take the plural in {-Du'}.
>
Voragh answered:
> Yes, they do. Countable body parts take {-Du'}, even if they come from sever
> al
> different bodies:
>
yes, but your examples don't really say anything about {'aD} and {Somraw}
they all refer to things that I readily accept as being body parts
veins and muscles don't "feel" like body parts to me
> : Also do {pob} and {jIb} refer to single strands of hair or are
> : they "mass" nouns as in English? If they are countable, are they
> : body parts? Any canon, please?
>
> pob "hair on body"
>
> [not attested in canon]
>
> jIb "hair on head"
>
> DaH jIbwIj vISay'nISmoH.
> I must wash my hair now. PK
>
> {jIb} seems to be a mass noun here -- it's unlikely s/he's talking about
> washing a single hair!
>
It could just as well be that the plural suffix on {jIb} is
simply omitted because indeed it would be unlikely that one
washes only a single hair.
> I suppose it helps to consider them uncountable mass nouns like {veD} "fur" o
> r
> even {quHvaj} "dandruff".
>
how does that help? German counts hair and dandruff and fur, although
they also exist as mass nouns.
>From Okrands post you cite, I guess Klingon might work here
like German, i.e., I may count them, but I may also use them
as mass nouns. Do you agree?
Marc Ruehlaender
aka HomDoq
[email protected]