tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Feb 15 14:52:49 2001

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

RE: K'Zhen Zu-Merz





> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Ruehlaender [mailto:[email protected]]

>
> > I understand the CVC norm, with the odd canon exceptions.
> I'm not suggesting
> > this is an exception
> > but rather that TKD suggests, to me, that <aw> is treated
> as the vowel..  My
> > belief is backed up as
> > <'> is a consonent which unless it is an exception idicates
> that if the <law'
> > >
> > in chimlaw' is a CVC and
> > not a CVCC.   If it's not an exception then the <aw>
> construction is  surely
> > being treated as a vowel.
>
> but {law'} *is* generally considered to be a CVCC,
> remember that -w' is one of the three -CC endings
> allowed, along with -y' and -rgh

But I thought <'> could only follow a vowel and TKD gives the <aw>
construction a vowel sound.
Putting those two ideas together means it can not be a CVCC exception it
must surely dfit into the CVC theme.

>
> > Don't get me wrong I'm not saying I  know, it's just how it
> appears to me.
> >
> > qe'San
>                                            Marc Ruehlaender
>                                            aka HomDoq
>                                            [email protected]
qe'San



Back to archive top level