tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Sep 21 21:12:38 2000

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: wa' waQ

• From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: wa' waQ
• Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 20:31:15 -0500
• In-Reply-To: <39C49885.14822.AE464B@localhost>
• References: <[email protected]>

>> When using a type-5 noun suffix, such as {-Daq}, the suffix goes on the verb
>> rather than the noun:
>>
>> {"SPiRaL" SumDaq} "At the nearby SPiRaL"

ja' "Joseph" <[email protected]>:
>Dupvam vIpIHpu'be'. <DaJ> lururbogh wotmeyvad Qap'a' neH?

QIj TKD 'ay' loS DoD loS (nav vaghmaH).
It only works that way with verbs used "adjectivally" after a noun.

><qachHom vIchenmoHDaq leng> lugh'a'? wotmey rar'egh'a' DIp
>mojaqmey?

lughbe' chovnatlhlIj.  wotDaq SaHchugh segh vagh DIp mojaq, mub je lengbogh
wot mojaqmey neH.
If there's a Type 5 noun suffix on an adjectival verb, the only verb
suffixes permitted are rovers. (TKD says only {-qu'} is okay, but we know
from other canon that {-be'} and {-Ha'} are possible.)

-- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh

• References:
  • Re: wa' waQ
    • From: "Joseph" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: *Italia*ngan qepHom wa'DIch [probably KLBC]
• Next by Date: Re: tlhIngan mu'ghom
• Prev by thread: Re: wa' waQ
• Next by thread: RE: wa' waQ
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level