tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Nov 29 23:03:06 2000
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: GHED (Unnecessary pronouns)
- From: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: GHED (Unnecessary pronouns)
- Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 02:01:26 EST
In a message dated 11/23/2000 11:46:23 PM Central Standard Time, 
[email protected] writes:
> >be' DaSov SoH = You know the woman.
> 
> Here the "unnecessary" pronoun is presumably <SoH>, a subject which is
> already made clear by the verb prefix. We're certainly in agreement on
> that. But what you seem to neglect to mention is *why* a speaker might
> choose to include this "unnecessary" pronoun. Okrand tells us they can
> 
The Grammar Highlight was only pointing out instances when the pronoun is not 
necessary, though optional.  A completely different highlight will deal with 
emphasis.  Thank you for introducing the concept of emphasis; this is as if 
you have posted a little of the highlight which is soon to come.
peHruS