tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Nov 22 13:19:13 2000

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: tera'ngan jIH / KLBC

• From: Pillow <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: tera'ngan jIH / KLBC
• Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 12:22:02 -0900
• References: <000001c054ae$3a4643e0$604fe8cd@0017279186> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

Hivqa' veqlargh! I forgot a verb suffix: I meant to write Damechqangchugh
or would <Damechqangbogh> be better?
                    pIl'o'

Pillow wrote:

>   tlhInganqoq  jechvaD  Deghmey   vIchenmoH.
>
> Damechqang  Dochmey 'IH yIDel!
>
> pIl'o'
> QUESTION:  if the <Dochmey> are direct objects, and the sentence implies
> that they are also indirect objects  (...if you are willing to trade
> *them*), must the <mech> verb take the  you-to-it/them  prefix? Should I
> repeat the object noun?

• References:
  • RE: tera'ngan jIH
    • From: "TPO" <[email protected]>
  • Re: tera'ngan jIH
    • From: "qIroS" <[email protected]>
  • Re: tera'ngan jIH / KLBC
    • From: Pillow <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: tera'ngan jIH / KLBC
• Next by Date: Re: Grammar Highlight Each Day (Adjectivals)
• Prev by thread: Re: tera'ngan jIH / KLBC
• Next by thread: RE: tera'ngan jIH
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level