tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Nov 22 13:10:42 2000

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: tera'ngan jIH / KLBC

• From: Pillow <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: tera'ngan jIH / KLBC
• Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 12:13:20 -0900
• References: <000001c054ae$3a4643e0$604fe8cd@0017279186> <[email protected]>

qIroS wrote:

> > > tlhIngan vIrur'eghmoH vIneH
> >
> > veng DaDabbogh  yIngu'
> >
> >

  tlhInganqoq  jechvaD  Deghmey   vIchenmoH.

Damechqang  Dochmey 'IH yIDel!

pIl'o'
QUESTION:  if the <Dochmey> are direct objects, and the sentence implies
that they are also indirect objects  (...if you are willing to trade
*them*), must the <mech> verb take the  you-to-it/them  prefix? Should I
repeat the object noun?

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: tera'ngan jIH / KLBC
    • From: Pillow <[email protected]>

• References:
  • RE: tera'ngan jIH
    • From: "TPO" <[email protected]>
  • Re: tera'ngan jIH
    • From: "qIroS" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Klingon WOTD: Dum (v)
• Next by Date: Re: tera'ngan jIH / KLBC
• Prev by thread: Re: tera'ngan jIH
• Next by thread: Re: tera'ngan jIH / KLBC
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level