tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Jul 14 09:59:22 2000

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: SeQpIr lut

• From: Pillow <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: SeQpIr lut
• Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 09:04:30 -0800
• References: <[email protected]>

> pIl'o':
> >> would <jatlhtaHghach> or <jatlhmeH  mu'mey> work instead of <SoQ>?
> DloraH:
> chaq [ghItlh].
> ghItlh - manuscript (n)

I wan under the impression <ghItlh> refered to the "writing" as in
physical scratchings on papers, the print. I want to words, what I'm
looking for in the sentence above is a proper way to disambiguate the the
concept of dialogue, actor's speech or soliloquey.
                                                                pIl'o'

• References:
  • Re: SeQpIr lut
    • From: TPO <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Outcomes
• Next by Date: Re: SeQpIr lut
• Prev by thread: Re: SeQpIr lut
• Next by thread: Klingon WOTD: namwech (n-body)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level