tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jan 18 18:56:48 2000

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: KLBC: QeD SoQ ngaj:

• From: "Andeen, Eric" <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: KLBC: QeD SoQ ngaj:
• Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 19:58:25 -0700

jatlh tuv'el:

> KLBC: QeD SoQ ngaj:

> 'u'majDaq Hut lurghmey lutu'lu'.  
> motlh wej lurghmey 'ej tIqHa'qu'mo' jav latlhmey So'.

maj. But I thought current string theory was all excited about *eleven*
dimensions. Time to go and read up on physics again.

> ghomey machqu' 'ochmey machqu' joq rur lurghmeyHeyvam tIqHa'.

maj.

> luleghlu'meH tlhoy mach 'ach 
> lujuvlu'meH tlhoyHa' tIqHa'.  

I don't think a <-meH> clause can work this way. The "being excessively
small" is not done for the purpose of someone seeing them; it just is.
Instead:

tlhoy machmo' leghlaH pagh 'ach ...

> ngoDvam Huj toblaHDI' tlhInganpu' 
> pIvchem'e' 'oghlaH 'ej qIb charghchoHqu'laH.

majQa'.


pagh
Beginners' Grammarian

tlhIngan Hol Mailing List FAQ
http://www.bigfoot.com/~dspeers/klingon/faq.htm

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: KLBC: QeD SoQ ngaj:
    • From: tuvel <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: KLBC: nIteb wIvonlu' pagh nItebHa' Qapchu'!
• Next by Date: Re: KLBC: QeD SoQ ngaj:
• Prev by thread: KLBC: QeD SoQ ngaj:
• Next by thread: Re: KLBC: QeD SoQ ngaj:
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level