tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Feb 20 22:36:58 2000
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: KLBC -- SuvwI'pu' Hol
- From: "Eric Andeen" <[email protected]>
- Subject: RE: KLBC -- SuvwI'pu' Hol
- Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 23:36:42 -0700
- Importance: Normal
jatlh Brian:
> pagh,
>
> Another attempt:
>
> SuvwI'pu' Hol -- Warriors' Language?
>
> My thinking here should be obvious <g>.
This is correct. However, the plural suffix <-pu'>, like the other plural
suffixes, is almost always optional. When used before <Hol> to talk about
language names, Okrand has always left it off, and I would suggest you do
the same here, winding up with just <SuvwI' Hol>.
pagh
Beginners' Grammarian