tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Feb 12 06:50:01 2000
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Subject: Re: Canonical Klingon
- From: "Daryl Quick" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Subject: Re: Canonical Klingon
- Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2000 09:51:01 -0500
Subject: Re: Canonical Klingon
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
jatlh DujHoD
>qawmoH charghwI':
>>Remember that there are currently four main word lists:
>>TKD
>>TKD Addendum
>>KGT
>>The KLI New Words List
>ghel veS joH:
>>so in other words, if there is a word on an email that is not in any >>of the
>>afore mentioned lists, it's either misspelled, or all together an >>incorrect
>>word? There are no other lists of canonical words ANY WHERE?
(jatlh DujHoD)
>tetlhmeyvamDaq Dachbogh mu' Daleghchugh, vaj qIttaH loS nuH.
(my translation-to keep from confusing anyone-so I can ask my question)
-->if you see a word which is absent from these lists, then
-->[there are] always (from continually possible)
--> four posibilities
>1) "spell"Ha'lu'.
>2) tlhIngan Hol mu' 'oHbe'.
>3) <<tlhIngan Hol yejHaD mu' chu' tetlh>>Daq wej chellu'.
nuq?
nuqDaq nuH loSDIch 'oH ?
--> where is the fourth possibility?
chavta'ngav