tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Aug 02 08:53:46 2000

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: KLBC: relative clauses again (and some un-relative-clause stuff)

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: KLBC: relative clauses again (and some un-relative-clause stuff)
• Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2000 11:53:18 EDT

TKD does refer to (puq) as offspring, indicating that ghew puq and ghargh puq are correct.

peHruS

• Prev by Date: RE: Qap'a' De'wI''a'?
• Next by Date: I'm new to the list and Klingon too.
• Prev by thread: Re: KLBC: relative clauses again (and some un-relative-clause stuff)
• Next by thread: Re: KLBC: relative clauses again (and some un-relative-clause stuff)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level