tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Apr 18 23:51:59 2000

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: (KLBC) troubles with {paghmo' tIn mIS}

• From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: (KLBC) troubles with {paghmo' tIn mIS}
• Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 00:55:51 -0500
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

>wa' tlhIngan mu' ngaSbogh QIn'e' qonta' veS joH:
>>Yaj'a'?
>
>jang *pagh:
>>wa' tlhIngan Hol mu''e' Dalo'bogh DaghItlhHa'ba'.

ja' DujHoD:
>I have a quick question: does this mean
>"You obviously miswrote the one Klingon word that you used."
>or
>"You obviously miswrote one Klingon word that you used."
>or can it mean either?

In isolation it *could* mean either, but in this case the meaning was
glaringly obvious.  (The note written by veS joH contained exactly one
Klingon word, with the first letter wrongly capitalized.)

-- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh

• References:
  • Re: (KLBC) troubles with {paghmo' tIn mIS}
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: Re: Qap qepHommaj
• Next by Date: Re: KLBC: sentence structure question
• Prev by thread: Re: (KLBC) troubles with {paghmo' tIn mIS}
• Next by thread: RE: (KLBC) troubles with {paghmo' tIn mIS}
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level