tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Apr 10 07:33:44 2000

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: (KLBC) troubles with {paghmo' tIn mIS}

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: (KLBC) troubles with {paghmo' tIn mIS}
• Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 08:15:49 EDT

wa' tlhIngan mu' ngaSbogh QIn'e' qonta' veS joH:
>Yaj'a'?

jang *pagh:
>wa' tlhIngan Hol mu''e' Dalo'bogh DaghItlhHa'ba'.

I have a quick question: does this mean
"You obviously miswrote the one Klingon word that you used."
or
"You obviously miswrote one Klingon word that you used."
or can it mean either? (Of course, the only difference between the two
sentences in English is the presence or absence of the definite article,
which Klingon obviously lacks.)


                                        DujHoD

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: (KLBC) troubles with {paghmo' tIn mIS}
    • From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Klingon WOTD: boH (v)
• Next by Date: RE: KLBC cha' yu'
• Prev by thread: Re: (KLBC) troubles with {paghmo' tIn mIS}
• Next by thread: Re: (KLBC) troubles with {paghmo' tIn mIS}
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level