tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Nov 23 08:01:07 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: ghoj (was: Re: Klingon Poetry for College (2nd attempt)

From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: ghoj (was: Re: Klingon Poetry for College (2nd attempt)
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 11:00:30 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
In-Reply-To: <004701bf3545$3aca1140$a45c103f@ras>
Priority: NORMAL

On Mon, 22 Nov 1999 18:56:18 -0500 David Trimboli 
<[email protected]> wrote:

> jIjatlh:
> > > Yes, yes, I'm not saying there aren't more accepted ways of doing this.
> I
> > > was specifically discussing the possibilities of "ditransitivity."  The
> > > above suggestion assumes they do occur.
> 
> jatlh charghwI':
> > wej mIwvam lo' matlh. chaq not lo'. latlh mIw lo'ta'. qatlh
> > mIwvetlh Dapar?
> 
> 
> moH.
 
toH. mIw 'IH neH Dalaj. wejpuH. moH butlh 'e' DaHar'a'?
 
> SuStel
> Stardate 99893.2

charghwI'

Follow-Ups:
- chutqoq
  - From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
- Re: ghoj (was: Re: Klingon Poetry for College (2nd attempt)
  - From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: ghoj (was: Re: Klingon Poetry for College (2nd attempt)
  - From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: ramvam QujDaq pInwI' vItlhej
Next by Date: KLBC and response ...
Prev by thread: Re: ghoj (was: Re: Klingon Poetry for College (2nd attempt)
Next by thread: chutqoq
Index(es):