tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed May 26 11:52:35 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: mojaq <-jaj> <-ghach> <-ta'> je
- From: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: mojaq <-jaj> <-ghach> <-ta'> je
- Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 14:51:28 EDT
In a message dated 5/22/1999 8:35:24 AM US Mountain Standard Time,
[email protected] writes:
<< wa'leS vIchoHqa'ta'[tomorrow, it will again have been fixed],
approximately at least, teh aspect marker simply indicates that the
action is not ~right now~ taking place, and the \wa'leS/ states that the
/not right now\ will be tomorrow;
[[is my explanation syncing with the veterans' golden input?]] >>
==============
qay'be'. The Aspect marker {-ta'} has to show an action which is wholly
completed. The completion could be wholly accomplished already right now.
But, because of the time stamp {wa'leS} the whole action will accomplish its
completion tomorrow.
{-ta'} does not preclude the action being right now, the {wa'leS} does that.
The {-ta'} does imply that the entire entity of action is "intentionally
perfected."
Dunbogh paqmey law' vIchupta'. tIlaD.
peHruS